• Home
  • Blog
  • The Enterprise Skilling Challenge: Why Work-Anchored Strategies Win

The Enterprise Skilling Challenge: Why Work-Anchored Strategies Win

,

Workforce development strategies have failed to match the pace of change in today’s dynamic business environment, and the consequences of falling behind are higher than ever. Ineffective approaches can lead to misallocated resources, lost time, and a demotivated workforce—issues that only intensify with the adoption and disruption of AI.

Gone are the days when a single, static strategy could suffice. Success now requires an agile and adaptable approach to skills development that anticipates and embraces ongoing change. While the path forward for organizations is clear, implementing these strategies isn’t always so simple.

Let’s explore why enterprise skilling poses such a challenge and how organizations can develop more effective approaches by focusing on the work that actually gets done.

The Challenges of Enterprise Skilling

At its core, an enterprise skilling architecture serves as a framework for assessing, validating, and developing the skills within your workforce. This architecture provides crucial insights for individuals, managers, and the organization as a whole.

An enterprise skilling architecture helps:

  • Employees gain clarity on how to enhance their value.
  • Managers ensure they have the right talent in the right roles.
  • Organizations align their workforce capabilities with strategic business objectives.

Implementing a comprehensive enterprise skilling strategy involves several complex elements, including skills gap analysis, progression planning, and skill development programs. Some of the key challenges that organizations face include:

  • Achieving Alignment: Organizations often struggle to create a common language and unified vision for skill development that resonates across all departments and levels.
  • Ensuring Continuity: Bridging the gap between recruitment and ongoing professional growth requires a seamless integration of skilling programs.
  • Maintaining Visibility: Clear insights into both present and emerging skill needs are crucial at every organizational tier.
  • Validating Skills: The challenge lies in creating robust, long-term systems to assess and confirm employee capabilities.
  • Empowering Employees: Nurturing an environment where employees take charge of their own skill advancement can be a complex undertaking.
  • Measuring Impact: Quantifying the success of skill development initiatives through data-driven analysis is key to ongoing refinement.
  • Staying Agile: Flexibility in skill strategies is paramount as companies navigate ever-changing market demands and industry shifts.
  • Driving Performance: The ultimate goal is to translate newly acquired skills into tangible improvements in both individual output and overall business results.

Because a skilling architecture touches so many facets of an organization’s operations, it’s critical to build a skilling strategy that works across all affected areas. Skilling strategies grounded in the work that employees actually perform help to mitigate some of these challenges.

Anchoring Skill Strategies to Real Work

Relying too heavily on job descriptions is a common pitfall when developing a skilling framework. The reality is that job descriptions often fail to accurately capture the skills employees use in their day-to-day work. If a skilling strategy is built off a job description and not the work that really happens, it’s going to miss the mark.

Ravin Jesuthasan and John W. Boudreau explore the importance of deconstructing job roles into skill sets in their book Work Without Jobs: How to Reboot Your Organization’s Work Operating System. A striking real-world application of this emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic when the Providence Health & Services hospital system faced a critical shortage of nursing staff. By analyzing the daily tasks performed by nurses, the hospital system identified activities that didn’t require full nursing qualifications.

These “below license” duties, such as routine patient monitoring and basic documentation, were reassigned to other capable staff members. This innovative redistribution of work enabled the organization to optimize its use of specialized nursing skills, allowing nurses to use their expertise on more complex “top of license” responsibilities. Overall, this reallocation of human resources helped blunt the catastrophic effects of unprecedented healthcare demand.

By anchoring your enterprise skilling strategy to the work that actually occurs, rather than static job descriptions, you’ll be better positioned to accurately assess your workforce’s current capabilities and future skill needs. This approach allows for more targeted upskilling and reskilling efforts, ultimately leading to a more agile and effective organization.

5 Ways to Anchor Your Skilling Strategy to the Work

To create more effective skilling strategies, organizations should focus on the actual work being performed. To anchor a skilling strategy to the work, organizations should:

  1. Deconstruct Job Roles: Break down jobs into their component tasks and required skills. This approach can reveal opportunities for more efficient work allocation.
  2. Document Real-World Skills: Carefully observe and record the skills employees use to generate work outputs on a daily basis.
  3. Leverage AI for Insights: Use artificial intelligence to analyze complex relationships between skills, tasks, and job roles within your organization.
  4. Embrace Flexibility: Recognize that AI and other disruptive forces are continuously reshaping how work gets done. Your skilling strategy should be adaptable to these changes.
  5. Focus on Work Outputs: Instead of rigidly defining roles, concentrate on the work that needs to be accomplished and the skills required to do it effectively.

Navigating the Future with Work-Based Enterprise Skilling

Especially with the growing influence of AI, the ability to adapt and redistribute work will become increasingly critical in the marketplace. A pragmatic work-centered approach to enterprise skilling can provide the flexibility, agility, and ability to anticipate demands that will be desperately needed to navigate the future.

About the Authors

Matt Donovan
Chief Learning & Innovation Officer
Early in life, I found that I had a natural curiosity that not only led to a passion for learning and sharing with others, but it also got me into trouble. Although not a bad kid, I often found overly structured classrooms a challenge. I could be a bit disruptive as I would explore the content and activities in a manner that made sense to me. I found that classes and teachers that nurtured a personalized approach really resonated with me, while those that did not were demotivating and affected my relationship with the content. Too often, the conversation would come to a head where the teacher would ask, “Why can’t you learn it this way?” I would push back with, “Why can’t you teach it in a variety of ways?” The only path for success was when I would deconstruct and reconstruct the lessons in a meaningful way for myself. I would say that this early experience has shaped my career. I have been blessed with a range of opportunities to work with innovative organizations that advocate for the learner, endeavor to deliver relevance, and look to bend technology to further these goals. For example, while working at Unext.com, I had the opportunity to experience over 3,000 hours of “learnability” testing on my blended learning designs. I could see for my own eyes how learners would react to my designs and how they made meaning of it. Learners asked two common questions: Is it relevant to me? Is it authentic? Through observations of and conversations with learners, I began to sharpen my skills and designed for inclusion and relevance rather than control. This lesson has served me well. In our industry, we have become overly focused on the volume and arrangement of content, instead of its value. Not surprising—content is static and easier to define. Value (relevance), on the other hand, is fluid and much harder to describe. The real insight is that you can’t really design relevance; you can only design the environment or systems that promote it. Relevance ultimately is in the eye of the learner—not the designer. So, this is why, when asked for an elevator pitch, I share my passion of being an advocate for the learner and a warrior for relevance.
Peggy Durbin
Sr. Learning Consultant
Peggy Durbin is a Sr. Learning Consultant on the Innovation Research and Development team at GP Strategies. For 30 years, Peggy has been involved in many aspects of performance consulting: conducting Design Thinking workshops, developing Learner Experience playbooks, and formulating measurement strategies. Her passion for learner-centric design and innovative consulting strategies and technologies is reflected in numerous successful client engagements across many industries. 

Get in touch.

Learn more about our talent transformation solutions.

Transformation doesn’t happen overnight if you’re doing it right. We continuously deliver measurable outcomes and help you stay the course – choose the right partner for your journey.

Our suite of offerings include:

  • Managed Learning Services
  • Learning Content Design & Development
  • Consulting
  • AI Readiness, Integration, & Support
  • Leadership & DEI Training
  • Technical Training
  • Learning Technologies & Implementation
  • Off-the-Shelf Training Courses